Tomb is found empty
Key Verses: 1, 7, 18
Rituals around death are almost
universal. Preparing the body for burial was an important part of saying goodbye.
We have relegated this to “professionals” at the funeral home. In Jesus’ day
the close women relatives would do the job. Since Jesus was rushed to the grave
before sunset in order to observe the special rituals around the Passover feast,
they had hastily placed Jesus in a borrowed tomb. Spice would have been added
to cover the smell, and a year later the bones would have been gathered stored
together in a much smaller container.
But when the women get there, Jesus isn’t
there. The tomb is not secure. The Roman guards have failed to keep Jesus from
rising from the dead, an impossible task. The women become the first people to
carry the message of the Resurrection. They aren’t really sure what it all
means, but they obey and go tell the disciples. Peter is singled out as one who
needs to hear the good news. He needs the news, having betrayed Jesus only
three days before.
One of the curious things about the
Scriptures is that we don’t have the original writings. But we don’t need them.
Instead, we have thousands of copies over a great timeframe and geographic
diversity. In addition we have people who quoted the Scriptures, almost every
verse. Plus, the Scriptures were translated into multiple languages around the
same time as the original writing. And when you compare all these sources there
is almost complete agreement about what the original said. Only a very small
percentage of differences exist, mostly spelling of names and slight changes in
the spelling of a few other words. This passage at the end of Mark is one of
the few exceptions to this trend.
It could be that these few verses
were originally part of Mark, or that the last page was lost almost at the time
of its writing and someone familiar with the content of the original wrote this
to fill in the missing material.
There are several very unique things
in this section that don’t seem to fit with any other portion of the New Testament
teaching, and especially Mark’s style. Mark has been rapid fire events with
little commentary or summary work. This section is filled with summary and
commentary. It seems out of place. If it were not part of the original, in my
opinion, we would not loose anything of importance to the message of Mark, and
of the Scriptures as a whole.
When I am serving as a pastor of a
congregation I preach through Mark, including this section, gleaning from even
this passage Truth that is present. So, read it and listen to hear what God can
teach you about Himself and about the nature of our relationship with Him. But,
I would not get in a long discussion about its content and the theology
presented here.